|
Local Report for Long Island: Executive
Summary
An estimated
259,000 Long Islanders turn to a soup kitchen, food pantry
or emergency shelter for help with food each year. 93,000
of them are children.
More than two out of every five people
who seek help from such emergency food programs on Long Island
must choose between
paying for food and paying their rent or mortgage, and more
than one
out of four must choose between food and medicine or medical
care.
These are some of the findings of Hunger in America
2006, a national study conducted by America’s Second
Harvest – the
Nation’s
Food Bank Network (A2H). The study, conducted every four
years, gathers information on programs and agencies served
by A2H’s
network of food banks and food rescue organizations and
the clients of their emergency food programs (soup kitchens,
food pantries,
and shelters). The national effort included collecting
data
from more than 52,000 emergency food program clients and
30,000 agencies.
The data was analyzed by Mathematica Policy Research to
provide statistics at the national, state, and local levels.
Island
Harvest, Long Island’s Source Authority on
Food Rescue, and Long Island Cares – The Harry Chapin
Food Bank are the two Long Island members of A2H. Together,
we serve about
787 emergency food programs and other community-based non-profit
programs, all of which are addressing the serious problem
of people struggling to get enough to eat in one of the
wealthiest
regions of the country. The local results are based on
surveys of clients of emergency food programs that receive
donated food
from Island Harvest, Long Island Cares, or both.
This report
summarizes the key findings of the Long Island report of
Hunger in America 2006, including demographics
of the 259,000 individuals served and characteristics
of the agencies supplying food to them.
The Face of Hunger on Long Island
Like Long Island’s overall population, the individuals receiving food from
emergency food programs represent a broad range of demographics.
• About 37% are non-Hispanic white, 32% are non-Hispanic black, 23% are
Hispanic
and the rest are from other racial or ethnic groups
• 54% are women
• More than one third (36%) are children (under 18)
• 15%, or about 39,000, are senior citizens (65 or older)
• 4% are homeless
• 85% are U.S. citizens
• Among client households with children under 18, 45% are single-parent
households
• Among individuals visiting an emergency food program, 62% have at least
a high
school diploma
The study also found that having a job does not guarantee
having enough to eat. Nearly half (47%) of the Long Island households that
rely on
emergency food programs
include at least one employed adult. Nor are Social Security and Supplemental
Security Income (SSI) recipients protected from need—34% and 23%
of client households reported receiving income from these programs, respectively.
In contrast,
only 14% of households had received money from traditional welfare programs
(Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and General Assistance) in the
previous month.
9% of households had no income at all, and overall, 57% of households
had incomes below the federal poverty threshold in the previous month—which
means that as many as 43% had incomes above the poverty line, but still
had to turn to an
emergency food program.
Among the other findings about the members of households served by
emergency food programs was the fact that, despite government programs
designed
to keep children from going hungry, families with kids were more likely
to
experience food insecurity than those without, and about as likely
to be experiencing
hunger. Food insecurity is defined by the USDA as “limited or uncertain availability
of nutritionally adequate and safe foods or limited or uncertain ability to acquire
acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways” while hunger is defined as “the
uneasy or painful sensation caused by a lack of food. The recurrent and involuntary
lack of food”. Among all households surveyed, 69% were food insecure and
25% were experiencing hunger. But among households with children under 18, those
numbers jumped to 76% and 24%, respectively.
Tough Choices
Hunger in America 2006 found that 56% of households served by emergency
food programs had to choose between paying for food and paying for
necessities like utilities, housing, and medicine:
• 42% had to choose between paying for food and paying for utilities
or heating fuel
• 45% had to choose between buying food and paying their rent or mortgage
• 28% reported having to choose between food and medicine or medical
care
• 17% of all client households reported having faced all three
of these situations in the
last year
The Importance of the Emergency
Food Program Network
The study shows the importance of emergency food programs in bridging
the gap between people’s resources and their nutritional needs. In many cases government
food assistance was not enough or was not accessible. Although 58% of households
surveyed had applied for food stamps, only 27% were currently receiving them,
and for those, the monthly allocation lasted an average of 2.6 weeks. 44% of
families with preschool children participated in the Supplemental Nutrition Program
for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) and 54% participated in school lunch programs.
Only 14% of these families participated in summer food programs,
meant to provide a nutritious lunch during the summer months. This
disparity
might
be explained
by the fact that 46% of the households surveyed did not have a working
car, which could limit them to getting help at locations accessible
by pubic transportation
or within walking distance. The results suggest that these families
turn to emergency
food programs instead, since 38% of food pantries, 36% of soup kitchens,
and 13% of shelters surveyed reported that they serve many more children
during
the summer than in other seasons.
The Agencies on the Front Lines
In any given week, emergency food programs on Long Island serve about
44,000 people. Although the overwhelming majority (97%) of clients
surveyed were “very
satisfied” or “somewhat satisfied” with the amount of food
they received from their emergency food program, 47% of the pantries and 32%
of the kitchens that had turned away clients in the previous year had done so
due to a lack of food. Funding and food supply are the biggest challenges faced
by these emergency food programs as they work to serve growing numbers of people
(67% of pantries, 54% of kitchens, and 32% of shelters reported that there had
been an increase since 2001 in the number of clients who came to their sites).
These agencies are heavily faith-based and volunteer-driven, the
study found. 74% of pantries, 53% of kitchens and 27% of shelters
are run
by faith-based
agencies affiliated with churches, mosques, synagogues, and other
religious organizations
(however, it should be noted that Island Harvest and Long Island
Cares do not serve agencies that have a religious participation requirement).
90%
of pantries,
88% of kitchens, and 54% of shelters use volunteers, with 51% of
pantries
and 59% of kitchens relying entirely on volunteers, having no paid
staff at all.
Food rescue organizations and food banks are by far the most important
source of food for the emergency food programs, accounting for 65%
of the food used
by pantries, 39% of kitchens’ food, and 40% of shelters’ food. Although
all emergency food programs had other food resources, including donations from
religious congregations, government commodity programs, and direct purchases,
most rely on Island Harvest and Long Island Cares to survive. 91% of pantries,
68% of kitchens, and 83% of shelters believed that the elimination of the food
rescue organization or food bank would have a “significant” or “devastating” impact
on their programs.
Conclusion
Long Island’s hungry are a vast and varied population that includes all
races and ethnicities, ages, and education levels. About 93,000 of them are children,
and another 39,000 are senior citizens. Almost half the affected households include
at least one employed adult, and the average annual household income is $13,440.
More than half of them must choose between food and other necessities. They turn
to a network of food pantries, soup kitchens and shelters to make ends meet.
These agencies are largely faith-based and rely heavily on volunteers and on
the food they receive from Long Island Cares and Island Harvest. Without us,
many of these emergency food programs would not be able to provide the much-needed
safety net they currently offer their clients.
|